问题已解决
老師:為何本題支付違約金是無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任?無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)也支付違約金,聽(tīng)起來(lái)那么怪?
FAILED
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/defa8/defa8a18edd57f3e0d7d4f16b3ab8afee19d7f75" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ba00/0ba006af587ae26207307db90ed25aa5424d4c9b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d4a/58d4ac0600563fc2442d4a6b98bca379844a8f1d" alt=""
民法典原則上采用無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則,在一些特定情況下采用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。首先,當(dāng)事人不履行合同義務(wù)的,即應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任,原則上不考慮其是否有過(guò)錯(cuò)。這有利于促使當(dāng)事人認(rèn)真履行合同義務(wù),有利于促使守約方的利益。其次,并不是說(shuō)當(dāng)事人對(duì)一切不履行合同的行為都要承擔(dān)責(zé)任。有法定或約定的免責(zé)事由的,可免于承擔(dān)全部或部分責(zé)任。
2022 11/19 18:06
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14de5/14de592086a6002ac8123c9ffd6fa7aba467cdd5" alt=""