"Financial Report":Loan contract

來源: 正保會計網(wǎng)校編輯：小鞠橘桔 2020/12/04 14:14:55　字體：大小

學(xué)習(xí)是一個不斷積累的過程，每天學(xué)習(xí)一點，每天進步一點！為了幫助大家更高效地備考2021年CFA考試，正保會計網(wǎng)校每日為大家上新CFA習(xí)題供大家練習(xí)。讓網(wǎng)校與您一起高效備考2021年CFA考試，夢想成真！

Questions 1:

A company that provides cruise ship vacations uses term loans to finance the acquisition of new cruise ships. Which of the following is most likely a negative covenant for the loans? The company must:

A 、ensure the ships are insured.

B、 seek lender approval to pay dividends.

C、 maintain a minimum level of working capital.

Questions 2:

A company issued bonds in 2012 that mature in 2022. The measurement basis that will most likely be used on the 2012 balance sheet for the bonds is:

A、 amortized cost.

B 、market value.

C 、historical cost.

View answer resolution

【Answer to question 1】B

【analysis】

B is correct. Negative covenants require that a borrower not take certain actions. The requirement to seek the lender’s approval before paying dividends is an example of a negative covenant. The other two are affirmative covenants.

A is incorrect. This is an affirmative covenant. The bank would want to ensure that the ships, or collateral for the loan, are adequately insured.

C is incorrect. This is an affirmative covenant. Maintaining a minimum level of working capital is often a covenant to ensure the company has adequate levels of liquidity to make the interest payments.

【Answer to question 2】A

【analysis】

A is correct. Bonds payable issued by a company are financial liabilities that are usually measured at amortized cost.

B is incorrect. Only financial liabilities held for trading are measure at market value, and that does not include bonds issued by the company.

C is incorrect. Historical cost would record the bonds at the value at date of issue and not amortize the bond premium or discount over the life of the bond.

成功=時間+方法，自制力是這個等式的保障。世上無天才，高手都是來自刻苦的練習(xí)。而人們經(jīng)常只看到“牛人”閃耀的成績，其成績背后無比寂寞的勤奮。小編相信，每天都在勤奮練習(xí)，即使是一點點的進步，大家一定可以成為人人稱贊的“牛人”。

下一篇："Financial Report":Revaluation model